I Don’t Know What Title to Give This Post

Okay, so Mr. BlueAlto (I believe his name is Al) left a great comment on my last post that I want to respond to but I have to admit that I’m not really sure how to respond.  This is the part that I want to address:

“Where Joe has expressed a problem on that, and where I completly agree with him, is in the idea of an earned acceptance being something that will see our progress toward human equality and civil rights based on being “very good gay people” who are polite, wear Brooks Brothers, don’t march in gay pride events, and are monogamous in a LTR. I call BS on that being the only or even the best option. Rights are rights, and the mentality that attempts to buy a spot at that very unethically constructed table will always be experienced by many among usis nothing but further oppression. The masters tools tearing down the masters house analogy.

“They aren’t like us, therefore they are less than”. That mindset demonstrates the following:

A denial of access, based on a flawed and subjective assignment of what confers a right to access.”

Okay…right off the bat, I’m kinda retarded so if I have completely missed the point of what you were saying here, I apologize.  But I also have to state that I DON’T CARE how other people live their lives.  Truly, I mean that!  I don’t care if you are a straight 435 lb. nudist or a Wiccan or a born-again evangelical or a circuit party gay drug-abusing whore.  I just don’t care.  If you aren’t hurting me or those close to me, how you opt to live your life is your business and I’m certainly not going to interfere with it.  When it comes to lifestyle choices, I’m about as open and uncaring as you can get.  That doesn’t necessarily mean that I don’t find certain choices to be distasteful to me personally but I certainly don’t push my beliefs on anyone else.  All one need do is take a look at the cross-section of people I consider to be my closest friends and the differences in how they live their lives is apparent. 

With that said, I guess my problem with this arguement is that it invokes the presumption that someone other gay people might call an “assimilationist” has made a conscious decision to attempt to gain acceptance from straight society.  I’m sorry, but with the exception of those freaks known as Log Cabin Republicunts, I find the idea of that to be preposterous!  I just can’t believe that someone would consciously set out to do things in their life in the hopes of gaining them acceptance by straight people.  What is to gain from that?  Sure, they may be loved by the straights but it doesn’t gain them any rights over any other gay people.  They are still “the gay one” and therefore the outsider.  Who would kid themselves into believing anything different?  This is where I believe your arguement is flawed.  I just don’t believe that anyone would really delude themselves into believing that by acting like straights, I will become accepted by straights.  It even sounds ridiculous just typing it!  Based on the “examples” that you stated in your comment, I am guilty of the crime of Assimilation and should probably be shot.  Let’s go through these, shall we?  1.) Polite.  Oh my goodness, I have the manners of a Victorian debutante!  My mother raised me to treat others with respect and dignity and I see absolutely no harm in doing so.  If there is something wrong with being polite in anyway, I’m oblivious to it.  2.) Wear Brooks Brothers clothing.  Are you kidding me?  I’ve got four kids!  Expensive name brand clothing is about as important to me as anything spoken by Paris Hilton, Brittney Spears or Chris Crocker.  3.) Don’t march in gay pride events.  Okay, all my life I have felt that parades are really stupid and pointless.  Oh!  Look!  There’s someone I don’t know or care about sitting in a car waving at me!  WTF?  So, no.  I don’t march in gay pride events.  Of course I understand what you are really getting at here and it is really more about participation in pride events rather than actually marching.  Honestly, I used to attend some of them way back when but now, I have no interest.  First, I hate crowds.  Second, I really can’t relate to most of those people.  I’m not a dancer, I’m happily partnered so therefore not looking for anyone, I can drink for far cheaper just by staying home, I don’t fit into any of the neat little categories that gay people enjoy stuffing themselves into.  Sorry but it all just feels rather contrived and phoney to me.  What is any of it really changing?  You can go to a gay bar any night of the week and get the exact same thing!  Some people might say, “But by attending pride, you’re supporting the community and letting people see who we are” or whatever.  Please!  The media will still only do a brief blurb on the news that evening and the only people that ever get shown are the 8 ft. tall scary drag queens or the practically naked leather boys.  Your average, ordinary, everday gay person is invisible.  Anyone who can’t admit that Pride is nothing more than an excuse to drink and pick up guys in the middle of the day instead of at night is in the minority and probably kidding themselves.  4.) Monogamous.  Yep.  And couldn’t be happier!  That’s not to say our relationship has always been that way.  We experimented…it was brief…and it didn’t work.  If it does for others, hey, great!  But they aren’t me.  5.) In a LTR.  19 years now and going strong.  So clearly, by the fact that my lifestyle is in line with the majority of the points that have been outlined, I am an “Assimilationist” except for one thing…I have never consciously made any decision to live my life the way I do in hopes of improving my standing within Straight Society.  We should probably add in there that I currently live in a suburb and have never isolated myself in a “gay ghetto”.  It just doesn’t hold any water with me. 

And, once again quite honestly, I would think that when straight people see me, or people like me, gay people would only stand to benefit in the area of civil rights and human equality.  I don’t quite “fit” their preconceived stereotypes of the limp-wristed flamer or the man who dresses in drag.  I’m rather ordinary and probably kinda boring, certainly nothing to be feared. 

The word “Assimilationist” when used by other gay people, is a SLUR.  Plain and simple.  It is designed to malign a group of individuals who don’t quite walk the walk or talk the talk that the Majority would like for them to do.  And in that sense, I would WANT to be an Assimilationist just to piss people off.  Because that’s the way I’ve lived my life for the last twenty years or so, doing whatever I wanted, especially if it went against what someone else expected of me or told me to do.  I am an INDIVIDUAL and for that, I am proud. 

Who made up these stupid rules anyway?

In closing, I have probably missed the point entirely and I don’t have the time to reread it to see if any of this even makes one iota of sense.  It probably doesn’t.  I don’t know, from now on, maybe I’ll start actively calling myself an Assimilationist just to piss people off. It sounds kind of fun.  I’m all about fun and being retarded.  Thank you BlueAlto for the comment!  I’ve decided that, no matter what I say, it isn’t going to change anything anyway so hey, whatevah.  I’m hap-hap-happy!

8 Responses to “I Don’t Know What Title to Give This Post”

  1. Well i hate to disagree with you…but everyday I get dressed for work, I dress like a girl..just so I don’t have to catch shit from the straight people. I love my job and it pays the bills, but if I was the dyke I am when I am off work…I would probably hate my job. So when I am with the straights I try to be like them, fit in….when I am with the gays..I get to be myself.

    I wish I could say I dont give a shit about what people say…or do…..but deep down I care.

  2. See, and I thought you were in a LTR for MY benefit. Crap. What will I tell all the other straights at the Gay Recruitment Meeting on Thursday? :)

  3. Maybe I’m misreading it, but it seems like the main point of argument is that people like you and Cooper who are so-called “assimilationists” make it harder for people who aren’t monogamous, march at pride events, live the stereotypical “lifestyle,” etc., to be accepted by the heterosexual mainstream. Which isn’t true, because there are plenty of people like you who are still subjected to bigotry and discrimination. And it isn’t fair, because why shouldn’t you be free to live your life as you see fit?

  4. wow…it’s hard work being gay…
    maybe I’m the stupid retarded one…but I always thought being straight or being gay is about sex…and i could give a fuck what people do in their bedroom…I don’t think being straight or gay has anything to do with morals, smarts, humor or anything else..it has to do with how you feel about another person…and when I meet straught people for the first time I don’t think…gee, I wonder how he and his wife have sex, if they do it missionary style or if they have oral sex…so why would I care about what a gay person does in his or her bedroom…what I want to know is are they a good person and do they think I’m funny..I have said it again and again over the years..I don’t care what anyone does…as long as they don’t do it in my front yard and scare my pets…

  5. I don’t know either.
    Al has a good point. “Earned acceptance” is a ruse. It negates the very idea of equal rights. There ain’t nothing equal about it. And it ain’t a “right” under those circumstances. Not the way I understand human rights.
    My point here is that equal rights are necessary for the glbt simply because it is proper. Nobody should have to prove anything, to assimilate, or live according to anyone else’s idea of what it means to be gay. By virtue of being human we all have the right to be treated humanely. And what we call Equal Rights are a part of that. For everyone.

  6. I’m not sure what sets us back, more. The policy-makers who want to squash our rights; or the gays finger-pointing at other gays. If I had to choose what hurts more, it would be the latter…..

  7. Just to clarify my points here, as I think the only person who really got what I was saying was Java. My overall point, besides the fact that rights are immutable, and should never be based on being seen as “just as worthy” as the straight community, was about acceptance of others.

    I agree that what someone does, is, says, etc. is not something I should be concerned about unless it directly hurts another. Whether they live in suburbia, or dress in drag at pride events. Either way, I feel they have a core human right to do what they want to do, even if I would never pick that option for myself. My point, was that I often see just as much vitriol from the assimilationist crowd, as the non assimilationist crowd. Each is as bad as the other in being intolerant of what they do not embrace, as far as I am concerned.

    I think that gay people, all of us (myself included), would do well to be a bit more accepting of each other,whatever stripe, hue, or “lifestyle”.

    As I said Kevin, best of luck, and I’m glad I have found a new read.

  8. Hi Kevin,
    First time reader of your blog. Just wanted to add that I thought Al’s point and your’s were actually not that different, until you seemed to go a bit defensive, and employed a wee bit of tone when comparing your life choices with those in the “gay ghetto”. I thought you both hit of on the head with the realzation that equal rights should be independent of whatever lifestyle you adopt. I didn’t read anyone’s comments here accusing you of being assimilationist. I think we all agree that human rights are inherent in being human, not the perfect human. I have read some pretty harsh comments from both sides of the wall regarding lifestyle choices, and how they effect the gay rights movement, but it is a moot point. If one of us is considered less than and unworthy of equal rights, based on limpwristedness or butch, urban or suburban, republican or democrat, etc., then we are all unworthy. The rights must be seen as immutable, not based on some fraternity blackball system of living upto a prescribed moral standard. I think both of you made this point?

Leave a Reply